1 Comment

Muslim of the Month Poll

Only one more poll after this until the Muslim of the Year nominees will have been finalized! Who will earn the title of Muslim of the Month for November?

Abdullah el-Faisal – Jamaican-born convert/cleric who said, “Those who want to go to jannah (Islamic heaven), it’s easy, just kill a kafir (infidel)… by killing that kafir, you have purchased your ticket to paradise.” el-Faisal also stated in a lecture, “So you go to India, and if you see a Hindu walking down the road you are allowed to kill him and take his money, is that clear?”

Martin Ahmad Couture-Rouleau – French-Canadian Muslim convert who ran down two soldiers, killing one, in an attempt to die as a “martyr” and be accepted into Islamic heaven. Rouleau claimed he carried out the attack for Allah before being shot dead by police.

Faleh Ghazi Albasman – Kuwaiti Muslim who immigrated to the UK with his 24-year-old daughter. When he saw his daughter talking on a cellphone, he stabbed her to death for ruining his “honor.”

Fazlul Haque Amini – Bangladeshi Islamic scholar/politician who said, “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge… Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.”


Your Daily Muslim #625: Pakeeza Shaikh

Pakeeza Shaikh

Pakeeza Shaikh

Unlike in the USA, Islam’s jihad against swimming pools is going swimmingly in Ausfailia. Pakeeza Shaikh, along with her family and numerous other Muslim families, went to the Adventure World water park in Perth. That’s when things took a turn for the dramatic when Shaikh’s traditional Islamic clothing was deemed to violate park standards.

The clothes Shaikh was wearing were street clothes, including a long, droopy top, and long pants. As is common for Muslimahs, many in the group were wearing headbags. Citing sanitation concerns seeing as Shaikh’s clothes were her street clothes, Adventure World staff told he she would not be allowed to enter the water because they would have to add more chlorine to remove the dirt transfer. Safety concerns with her long clothing were cited when she asked to go down a water slide, but was refused.

Instead of changing into something a bit less baggy, Shaikh saw a prime grievance-mongering opportunity. She filed a lawsuit against the park after complaining to the Equal Opportunity Commission, claiming she had felt humiliated by the staff because she covered herself. Since leftists see it as discrimination when Muslims are forced to follow the same rules as everyone else, Shaikh won $16,000 from the park, which has since stated it is reviewing its clothing policy… and likely upping the chlorine levels.

If you own or work at a swimming pool or other aquatic facility, protect yourself from litigation jihad: put up signs on the premises forbidding people from wearing street clothing or clothing which could be a safety hazard. Muslims cannot legitimately claim this is discrimination because the rule would apply unilaterally and would certainly end up affecting some non-Muslim patrons with poor choices of attire.


Your Daily Muslim #624: Mohammad Kazim bin Elias

Mohammad Kazim bin Elias

Mohammad Kazim bin Elias

Another day, another YDM named Mohammad… it never gets old. Malay Islamic scholar/preacher Mohammad Kazim bin Elias generated controversy recently after his condemnation of a (wait for it) dog-petting event. Islam views dogs as being nejis (ritually unclean), and Muhammad himself, pigs be upon him, called for the slaughter of canines. Apparently being cute and cuddly is haram.

The organizer of the event has been more or less forced into hiding due to death threats from Kazim’s rabid fans, including threats to stone him to death – all for organizing a harmless event where people can pet and possibly even adopt furry companions. Many of the foamers claimed the event’s organizer was trying to “destroy Islam” and the like. Kazim himself claimed it was a way to “inject pluralism and liberalism” into the Muslim ummah (spiritual community.) Because those are such bad things that the Muslim community totally isn’t in need of…

Kazim claimed the dog-petting event was a “subtle elbow movement” toward “legalizing something haram,” and also believes such events will “ultimately transform and negate the purpose of the law.” Kazim also mentioned that allowing this event could lead to a similar campaign involving petting and perhaps eating pigs. The self-imposed deprivation of bacon is quite possibly what has made over a billion Muslims worldwide go mad.

I left the foamers on Kazim’s post condemning the event, which has over 13,000 shares, a very nice comment. Now, I’m going to go look at pictures of Swedish Vallhunds because they are basically wolf corgis.


Your Daily Muslim #623: Michael Zehaf-Bibeau

Michael Zehaf-Bibeau demonstrating the peace his religion taught him

Michael Zehaf-Bibeau demonstrating the peace his religion taught him

In Canada, it would seem no soldier is safe. In the past three days, two converts to Islam have carried out jihad terror attacks against Canadian military personnel. Muslim convert Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, formerly known as Michael Joseph Hall, executed a soldier posted outside the National War Memorial by shooting him point-blank. The Muslim raised his arms in a display of victory and pride before rushing across the street, where he opened fire in Canada’s parliament building.

Luckily, the parliament’s sergeant-at-arms was nearby, and swiftly ended Zehaf-Bibeau’s jihad in a flurry of lead. The media, with the exception of right-leaning FOX News, has been somewhat hesitant to identify this shooting as the jihad attack it was.

A Twitter account linked to the Islamic State terror group posted an image of Zehaf-Bibeau, saying in a French caption, “a picture that will be of the Ottawa shooter.” The account has since been suspended. The fact that the Islamic State terror group would have an image of Zehaf-Bibeau and knew of his plans is fairly damning evidence that this mujahid had not only acted for his religion, he had done so after conspiring with other mujahideen. It is unknown if there are any more planned jihad attacks against Canadian military personnel. In the meantime, all Canadians should be very wary of Muslims in the wake of these attacks.


Your Daily Muslim #622: Martin Ahmad Couture-Rouleau

Another reason to oppose Islam: it turns people from eye candy into eyesores.

Before & after Islam. I bet his conversion (and subsequent cessation of grooming) did wonders for his sex life…

“Islam is the only true religion.”

You know Islam is the religion of peace when those who convert to it start killing innocent people. That’s exactly what 25-year-old French-Canadian Martin “Ahmad” Couture-Rouleau did. Couture-Rouleau spent his days growing his beard to appease the invisible sky-demon Allah, watching jihadist videos, and pretending the world would someday regress back to its 7th-century state. Of course, in order to achieve his goal of establishing the khilafah (Islamic nation), the kuffar (infidels) had to be eradicated.

Couture-Rouleau ran over two soldiers in his vehicle, one of whom died from his injuries. He phoned 911 and claimed he had carried out the terror attack for “Allah.” If that’s what pleases Allah, then Allah and all religions associated therewith have no place in a civilized society. The madness didn’t stop there. Police were nearby and drew their weapons. The knife-wielding Couture-Rouleau got out of his car and charged at the officers, who promptly sent him to his demise. Unfortunately for him, his 72 female virgins are too busy blogging about “social justice” issues on Tumblr while stuffing their faces and whining about “thin privilege.”

Couture-Rouleau’s Facebook is a typical, tragic mess of jihadist propaganda and anti-Semitism. He posted the following, all of which show evidence of an unstable, gullible mind:

“Allah has promised the hypocrite men and hypocrite women and the disbelievers the fire of Hell, wherein they will abide eternally. It is sufficient for them. And Allah has cursed them, and for them is an enduring punishment.” Yep, totally tolerant. Totally compatible with western ideals of harmonious coexistence.


Uhh, why is he condemning suicide? He totally committed suicide by cop; he had even told his friends he wanted to go to jannat al-firdaus (Islamic heaven) and be a shahid (martyr.) What a hypocrite! Also, the lack of belief in evolution despite the overwhelming evidence in favor of it goes to show the extent to which Couture-Rouleau believed in an ancient child-porn fairytale over reason.




Rouleau also posted numerous images mocking Christianity and atheism. As upcoming YDMs will show, Couture-Rouleau’s jihad attack was not the last of its kind.

1 Comment

Your Daily Muslim #621: Wedad Naser Lootah

Wedad Naser Lootah

Wedad Naser Lootah

This piece contains adult thematic material. Reader discretion is advised.

Full-time ninja/family counselor Wedad Naser Lootah is best known for her book, Top Secret: Sexual Guidance for Married Couples, in which she caused all sorts of controversy across the globe. The Emirati Muslimah drew harsh criticism from hardline Muslims, calling her an infidel for her discussion of sex acts in the tome. Others praised the book’s openness and discussion of widespread, albeit taboo, sexual practices. Of course, she directed the book at married couples, because no one ever has sex outside of marriage. Ever. Because that’s like the worst thing. Ever.

“I’m trying to guide people about how to satisfy each other and save society from illegal relationships – girlfriends, boyfriends,” Lootah said. “We’re talking about Islam.” Many Muslims believe it is haram (forbidden) to date before marriage, a common practice in civilized societies. Instead, Islam encourages its adherents to be thrown into arranged marriages by their families, which (as this site has shown) very frequently go south. Lootah believes those arranged to be married should meet before they are wed, but should not experience any pre-marital romance. Really? So basically she thinks that, by sticking two people together, sparks will end up flying. I hate to break it to her, but it doesn’t quite work that way.

Another subject Lootah has been very outspoken about is the alleged “danger” of anal sex, both in the context of homosexuality and heterosexuality. In her book, Lootah wrote, “many men who had anal sex with men before marriage want the same thing with their wives, because they don’t know anything else.” Or maybe they’re gay and still want the D, but the repressive, backward society they live in forbids it under penalty of jail, lashing, and/or death? Did Lootah think of and/or mention that? Nope, everything has to be within an Islamically-approved framework.

When interviewed, Lootah discussed the story of a young woman she had counselled. “One young girl got married, and for ten years her husband had anal sex with her, and surprisingly enough, she didn’t know it was forbidden,” Lootah said before getting into the prophet (pigs be upon him)’s preferred sexual positions. “One day, we had a class in religious law with a group of women. When we discussed family matters, we said women should observe the prophet’s tradition: ‘From the front and back but not in the anus.’ She began crying hysterically. She had not imagined that it was forbidden and harmful – and might bring a disease. We backed this up with examples from our daily lives. Nearly five million people in Africa have AIDS, and one of the reasons is anal sex.”

Uhh, WHAT?! Anal sex is not the main method by which HIV is spread in Africa; it is through vaginal intercourse. Anal sex can transmit HIV, but far more vaginal sex is occurring than anal, let’s be honest here. Also, her mention that anal sex might bring a disease is unnecessary fear-mongering – all sorts of sex can spread diseases. However, her attempt to make anal sex seem especially bad is the manifestation of the typical Islamic phobia of non-Islamic practices.

Lootah continues to serve as a family guidance counselor and sees numerous couples every day during the work week. Unfortunately, she still probably can’t tell when a man in an arranged marriage is a closet case.


Your Daily Muslim #620: Zunera Ishaq

No image of Zunera Ishaq was available. However, this is probably pretty close to what she looks like.

No image of Zunera Ishaq was available. However, this is probably pretty close to what she looks like.

Zunera Ishaq was brought to Canada from Pakistan by her husband in 2008. Now, she’s demanding Canada change its laws for her bizarre religious beliefs. Instead of being grateful for having been welcomed into Canada and for the opportunity to become a citizen, Ishaq put off her citizenship ceremony – because she wasn’t allowed to pretend it was Halloween and wear the traditional Islamic ninja costume, an oppressive garment she says she has worn since age 15, while taking the oath of citizenship.

All people who wish to become Canadian citizens (read: those too stupid to realize the USA is better) must take the oath of citizenship, which basically involves pledging allegiance to Canada. Oath-taking ceremonies normally involve dozens of people being in the room at once as each goes up and says a few magic words to become a filthy moose-humper. However, ninja-costume-wearing Ishaq refused to lower part of her veil so the officiant could see her lips moving during the ceremony, as is required of all taking the oath. Now, she’s filing a lawsuit against the Conservative party because the former immigration minister, a conservative, put the anti-ninja policy into effect.

Ishaq, who has joined a Facebook group in support of Islamist political party Jamaat-e-Islami, claims the ban on wearing ridiculous ninja costumes violates her right to express her religious beliefs, a right extended by Canada’s Charter. However, numerous parliamentarians disagree, citing that wearing a veil during the ceremony can be problematic since you can’t tell if a ninja’s lips are moving. “To segregate one group of Canadians or allow them to hide their faces, to hide their identity from us precisely when they are joining our community is contrary to Canada’s proud commitment to openness and to social cohesion,” wrote Jason Kenney, the minister who initially implemented the ban.

What do you think – should Ishaq be able to hide her face? Or should she be forced to briefly show it to take the oath, despite whatever religious obligations and/or self-image issues cause her to want to hide it?


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 239 other followers